SNe 2013K and 2013am: observed and physical properties of two slow, normal Type IIP events
L.Tomasella, E.Cappellaro, M.L.Pumo, A.Jerkstrand, S.Benetti,, N.Elias-Rosa, M.Fraser, C.Inserra, A.Pastorello, M.Turatto, J.P.Anderson, L., Galbany, C.P. Gutierrez, E.Kankare, G. Pignata, G.Terreran, S.Valenti,, C.Barbarino, F.E.Bauer, M.T.Botticella, T.W.Chen, A.Gal-Yam

TL;DR
This study presents detailed optical and near-infrared observations of two slow, normal Type IIP supernovae, revealing their physical properties, low luminosity, and progenitor characteristics through extensive photometry, spectroscopy, and hydrodynamical modeling.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed observational and modeling analysis of SNe 2013K and 2013am, highlighting their underluminous nature and progenitor properties.
Findings
Both supernovae are underluminous with faint peak magnitudes.
Ejected Nickel masses are approximately 0.012 and 0.015 solar masses.
Progenitors are consistent with moderate-mass red supergiants (~15 Msol).
Abstract
We present one year of optical and near-infrared photometry and spectroscopy of the Type IIP SNe 2013K and 2013am. Both objects are affected by significant extinction, due to their location in dusty regions of their respective host galaxies, ESO 009-10 and NGC 3623 (M65). From the photospheric to nebular phases, these objects display spectra congruent with those of underluminous Type IIP SNe (i.e. the archetypal SNe 1997D or 2005cs), showing low photospheric velocities (~2 X 10**3 km/s at 50d) together with features arising from Ba II which are particularly prominent in faint SNe IIP. The peak V-band magnitudes of SN 2013K (-15.6 mag) and SN 2013am (-16.2 mag) are fainter than standard-luminosity Type IIP SNe. The ejected Nickel masses are 0.012+-0.010 and 0.015+-0.006 Msol for SN 2013K and SN 2013am, respectively. The physical properties of the progenitors at the time of explosion are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
