A clean way to separate sets of surreals
Paolo Lipparini

TL;DR
This paper presents a simplified proof that for any two sets of surreal numbers with one set less than the other, there exists a surreal number strictly between them, using sign sequences.
Contribution
The paper introduces a streamlined proof for the separation of sets of surreals, leveraging properties of sign sequences to simplify classical arguments.
Findings
Existence of a surreal number between two sets when one is less than the other.
Simplification of classical proofs using sign sequence properties.
Compatibility conditions for separating sets of surreals.
Abstract
Let surreal numbers be defined by means of sign sequences. We give a proof that if are sets of surreals, then there is some surreal such that . The classical proof is simplified by observing that, for every set of surreals, there exists a surreal such that, for every surreal , we have if and only if the restriction of to the length of is . Hence if and only if satisfies the above condition, as well as its symmetrical version with respect to . It is now enough to check that if , then the two conditions are compatible.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Games · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
