Individuality and the account of non-locality: the case for the particle ontology in quantum physics

TL;DR

This paper advocates for a particle-based ontology in quantum physics, arguing it best addresses the measurement problem by minimally modifying classical mechanics, especially when compared to collapse theories.

Contribution

It defends the particle ontology as the most straightforward solution to quantum measurement issues, contrasting it with collapse theories like GRW.

Findings

Bohmian theory requires minimal modifications from classical mechanics.

Particle ontology effectively addresses the measurement problem.

Collapse theories involve more radical changes.

Abstract

The paper explains why an ontology of permanent point particles that are individuated by their relative positions and that move on continuous trajectories as given by a deterministic law of motion constitutes the best solution to the measurement problem in both quantum mechanics and quantum field theory. This case is made by comparing the Bohmian theory to collapse theories such as the GRW matter density and the GRW flash theory. It is argued that the Bohmian theory makes the minimal changes, concerning only the dynamics and neither the ontology nor the account of probabilities, that are necessary to get from classical mechanics to quantum physics. There is no cogent reason to go beyond these minimal changes.