Late time afterglow observations reveal a collimated relativistic jet in the ejecta of the binary neutron star merger GW170817
Davide Lazzati, Rosalba Perna, Brian J. Morsony, Diego, L\'opez-C\'amara, Matteo Cantiello, Riccardo Ciolfi, Bruno giacomazzo, Jared, C. Workman

TL;DR
Late-time observations of GW170817's afterglow reveal a structured, collimated relativistic jet, confirming the connection between binary neutron star mergers and short gamma-ray bursts, despite the initial faint gamma-ray detection.
Contribution
This study demonstrates that structured jets with energetic cores explain the afterglow brightness evolution, revealing the jet geometry and confirming the link between BNS mergers and short GRBs.
Findings
The afterglow brightening constrains jet structure and orientation.
GW170817 produced a relativistic jet with a core and wings.
Most BNS mergers may produce observable short GRBs if aligned properly.
Abstract
The binary neutron star (BNS) merger GW170817 was the first astrophysical source detected in gravitational waves and multi-wavelength electromagnetic radiation. The almost simultaneous observation of a pulse of gamma-rays proved that BNS mergers are associated with at least some short gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). However, the gamma-ray pulse was faint, casting doubts on the association of BNS mergers with the luminous, highly relativistic outflows of canonical short GRBs. Here we show that structured jets with a relativistic, energetic core surrounded by slower and less energetic wings produce afterglow emission that brightens characteristically with time, as recently seen in the afterglow of GW170817. Initially, we only see the relatively slow material moving towards us. As time passes, larger and larger sections of the outflow become visible, increasing the luminosity of the afterglow.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
