
TL;DR
This paper explores the ethical implications of future technologies that could enable identical repetitions of human lives, raising questions about their moral value and significance in population ethics.
Contribution
It introduces a novel discussion on the ethical considerations of life repetition technologies, a previously overlooked aspect of population ethics.
Findings
Highlights ethical questions about the value of repeated lives
Proposes that the moral significance depends on context and perception
Suggests future relevance for population ethics debates
Abstract
Suppose some future technology enables the same consciously experienced human life to be repeated, identically or nearly so, N times, in series or in parallel. Is this roughly N times as valuable as enabling the same life once, because each life has value and values are additive? Or is it of roughly equal value as enabling the life once, because only one life is enabled, albeit in a physically unusual way? Does it matter whether the lives are contemporaneous or successive? We argue that these questions highlight a hitherto neglected facet of population ethics that may become relevant in the not necessarily far distant future.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
