Gravity and Unification: A review
Kirill Krasnov, Roberto Percacci

TL;DR
This review explores classical unified theories combining gravity with other interactions, focusing on internal space enlargements within four-dimensional spacetime and comparing various formalisms and their achievements.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of different internal space unification schemes in gravity, highlighting their formalism and relation to Kaluza-Klein theories.
Findings
Enlarging internal space often yields gravity and Yang-Mills fields
Different formalisms like Einstein-Cartan and BF are reviewed and contrasted
Unified theories are compared to Kaluza-Klein approach
Abstract
We review various classical unified theories of gravity and other interactions that have appeared in the literature, paying special attention to scenarios in which spacetime remains four-dimensional, while an "internal" space is enlarged. The starting point for each such unification scenario is a particular formalism for General Relativity. We thus start by reviewing, besides the usual Einstein-Hilbert and Palatini formulations, the Einstein-Cartan, MacDowell-Mansouri and BF (both non-chiral and chiral) formulations. Each of these introduces some version of "internal" bundle and a dynamical variable that ties the internal and tangent bundles. In each of these formulations there is also an independent connection in the "internal" bundle. One can then study the effects of "enlarging the internal space", which typically leads to a theory of gravity and Yang-Mills fields. We review what has…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
