Deep ALMA photometry of distant X-ray AGN: improvements in star formation rate constraints, and AGN identification
F. Stanley, C. M. Harrison, D. M. Alexander, J. Simpson, K. K., Knudsen, J. R. Mullaney, D. J. Rosario, J. Scholtz

TL;DR
This study uses deep ALMA photometry combined with infrared data to improve star formation rate estimates and identify AGN in distant galaxies, revealing a higher fraction of measurable SFRs and AGN components than previous methods.
Contribution
It introduces the use of ALMA data to significantly enhance SFR constraints and AGN identification in high-redshift galaxies, improving upon prior infrared-only approaches.
Findings
Increased the fraction of galaxies with measured SFRs to 37%.
Identified a mid-IR AGN component in 50% of the sample.
Demonstrated the F870μm/F24μm-redshift plane as an effective AGN identification tool.
Abstract
We present the star formation rates (SFRs) of a sample of 109 galaxies with X-ray selected active galactic nuclei (AGN) with moderate to high X-ray luminosities (L(2-8keV)= 10^42-10^45 erg/s), at redshifts 1 < z < 4.7, that were selected to be faint or undetected in the Herschel bands. We combine our deep ALMA continuum observations with deblended 8-500{\mu}m photometry from Spitzer and Herschel, and use infrared (IR) SED fitting and AGN - star formation decomposition methods. The addition of the ALMA photometry results in an order of magnitude more X-ray AGN in our sample with a measured SFR (now 37%). The remaining 63% of the sources have SFR upper limits that are typically a factor of 2-10 times lower than the pre-ALMA constraints. With the improved constraints on the IR SEDs, we can now identify a mid-IR (MIR) AGN component in 50% of our sample, compared to only ~1% previously. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
