Lifting Linear Extension Complexity Bounds to the Mixed-Integer Setting
Alfonso Cevallos, Stefan Weltge, Rico Zenklusen

TL;DR
This paper develops a framework to extend inapproximability results from linear to mixed-integer formulations, establishing lower bounds on the number of integer variables needed for classical combinatorial optimization problems.
Contribution
It introduces a novel lifting technique that translates linear inapproximability bounds to the mixed-integer setting, providing tight bounds on integer variables required.
Findings
Any small mixed-integer formulation of certain polytopes requires (n/ log n) integer variables.
Classical polytopes like the matching and cut polytopes have polynomial-size mixed-integer formulations with O(n) or O(n log n) integer variables.
The paper presents a new decomposition method for approximating mixed-integer descriptions using affine subspaces.
Abstract
Mixed-integer mathematical programs are among the most commonly used models for a wide set of problems in Operations Research and related fields. However, there is still very little known about what can be expressed by small mixed-integer programs. In particular, prior to this work, it was open whether some classical problems, like the minimum odd-cut problem, can be expressed by a compact mixed-integer program with few (even constantly many) integer variables. This is in stark contrast to linear formulations, where recent breakthroughs in the field of extended formulations have shown that many polytopes associated to classical combinatorial optimization problems do not even admit approximate extended formulations of sub-exponential size. We provide a general framework for lifting inapproximability results of extended formulations to the setting of mixed-integer extended formulations,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
