Semi-Cartesian squares and the Snake Lemma
Jean-Claude Raoult

TL;DR
This paper introduces semi-cartesian squares within category theory to prove the snake lemma without relying on point-based or pseudo-element methods, offering a more abstract approach.
Contribution
It provides a novel proof of the snake lemma using semi-cartesian squares, avoiding traditional point-based or pseudo-element techniques.
Findings
Semi-cartesian squares are effectively used to prove the snake lemma.
The approach simplifies the proof by avoiding points and pseudo-elements.
The method aligns with categorical abstraction principles.
Abstract
The well-known snake lemma is proved entirely within category theory, without the help of "points with value in..." \`a la Grothendieck, nor pseudo-elements as in Guglielmetti & Zaganidis. Instead, we define and use consistently semi-cartesian squares, which were promoted by C. Chevalley.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFuzzy and Soft Set Theory · Rings, Modules, and Algebras · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
