Azimuthal anisotropy in Cu+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{NN}}}$ = 200 GeV
STAR Collaboration: L. Adamczyk, J. R. Adams, J. K. Adkins, G., Agakishiev, M. M. Aggarwal, Z. Ahammed, N. N. Ajitanand, I. Alekseev, D. M., Anderson, R. Aoyama, A. Aparin, D. Arkhipkin, E. C. Aschenauer, M. U. Ashraf,, A. Attri, G. S. Averichev, X. Bai, V. Bairathi, K. Barish

TL;DR
This study investigates azimuthal anisotropic flow in Cu+Au collisions at 200 GeV, revealing insights into initial density asymmetries, electric field effects, and flow harmonic scaling, with comparisons to other heavy-ion collision systems.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison of directed flow components in Cu+Au and Au+Au collisions, highlighting initial asymmetries and charge-dependent effects, and demonstrates flow harmonic scaling with constituent quarks.
Findings
Directed flow slope similar to Au+Au, shifted toward Cu direction
Charge-dependent mean transverse momentum observed
Flow harmonics scale with constituent quark number
Abstract
The azimuthal anisotropic flow of identified and unidentified charged particles has been systematically studied in Cu+Au collisions at = 200 GeV for harmonics 1-4 in the pseudorapidity range . The directed flow in Cu+Au collisions is compared with the rapidity-odd and, for the first time, the rapidity-even components of charged particle directed flow in Au+Au collisions at = 200~GeV. The slope of the directed flow pseudorapidity dependence in Cu+Au collisions is found to be similar to that in Au+Au collisions, with the intercept shifted toward positive values, i.e., the Cu-going direction. The mean transverse momentum projected onto the spectator plane, , in Cu+Au collision also exhibits approximately linear dependence on with the intercept at about , closer to the rapidity of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
