The VANDELS survey: Dust attenuation in star-forming galaxies at $\mathbf{z=3-4}$
F. Cullen, R. J. McLure, S. Khochfar, J. S. Dunlop, C. Dalla Vecchia,, A. C. Carnall, N. Bourne, M. Castellano, A. Cimatti, M. Cirasuolo, D. Elbaz,, J. P. U. Fynbo, B. Garilli, A. Koekemoer, F. Marchi, L. Pentericci, M. Talia,, G. Zamorani

TL;DR
This study analyzes dust attenuation in star-forming galaxies at redshifts 3-4 using a novel method based on intrinsic SED templates from simulations, finding a Calzetti-like attenuation curve and a stable A_V–M_* relation across redshifts.
Contribution
Introduces a new approach for directly recovering dust attenuation curves at high redshift using intrinsic SED templates from simulations, revealing a Calzetti-like law and stable A_V–M_* relation.
Findings
Attenuation curve similar to Calzetti law with R_V=4.18±0.29
A_V–M_* relation consistent with observations up to z=3
No significant evolution of A_V–M_* relation from z=0 to z=5
Abstract
We present the results of a new study of dust attenuation at redshifts based on a sample of star-forming galaxies from the VANDELS spectroscopic survey. Motivated by results from the First Billion Years (FiBY) simulation project, we argue that the intrinsic spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of star-forming galaxies at these redshifts have a self-similar shape across the mass range log probed by our sample. Using FiBY data, we construct a set of intrinsic SED templates which incorporate both detailed star formation and chemical abundance histories, and a variety of stellar population synthesis (SPS) model assumptions. With this set of intrinsic SEDs, we present a novel approach for directly recovering the shape and normalization of the dust attenuation curve. We find, across all of the intrinsic templates considered, that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
