Why surplus structure is not superfluous
James Nguyen, Nicholas J. Teh, and Laura Wells

TL;DR
This paper uses category theory to clarify the role of surplus gauge structure, showing it is essential for representing local, physically relevant fields in gauge theories.
Contribution
It provides a precise categorical analysis demonstrating the necessity of surplus structure in theories with local, physically meaningful gauge fields.
Findings
Surplus structure is essential for representing local gauge fields.
Category-theoretic tools clarify the role of surplus structure.
Surplus structure is not superfluous but functionally necessary.
Abstract
The idea that gauge theory has 'surplus' structure poses a puzzle: in one much discussed sense, this structure is redundant; but on the other hand, it is also widely held to play an essential role in the theory. In this paper, we employ category-theoretic tools to illuminate an aspect of this puzzle. We precisify what is meant by 'surplus' structure by means of functorial comparisons with equivalence classes of gauge fields, and then show that such structure is essential for any theory that represents a rich collection of physically relevant fields which are 'local' in nature.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
