Superconductivity-insensitive order at $q$~1/4 in electron doped cuprates
H. Jang, S. Asano, M. Fujita, M. Hashimoto, D. H. Lu, C. A. Burns,, C.-C. Kao, and J.-S. Lee

TL;DR
This study investigates charge density wave order in electron-doped cuprates, revealing that certain reflections are insensitive to superconductivity and differ from hole-doped cuprates, challenging the universality of CDW phenomena in high-$T_c$ cuprates.
Contribution
The paper provides direct experimental evidence that CDW-like reflections in electron-doped cuprates are superconductivity-insensitive and differ from hole-doped cuprates, questioning their universality.
Findings
Non-superconducting NCCO shows reflections at (~1/4, 0, l) similar to superconducting NCCO.
The observed reflections are insensitive to superconductivity.
Fermiology does not explain the wavevector of the reflections.
Abstract
One of the central questions in the cuprate research is the nature of the "normal state" which develops into high temperature superconductivity (HTSC). In the normal state of hole-doped cuprates, the existence of charge density wave (CDW) is expected to shed light on the mechanism of HTSC. With evidence emerging for CDW order in the electron-doped cuprates, the CDW would be thought to be a universal phenomenon in high- cuprates. However, the CDW phenomena in electron-doped cuprate are quite different than those in hole-doped cuprates. Here we study the nature of the putative CDW in an electron-doped cuprate through direct comparisons between as-grown and post-annealed NdCeCuO (NCCO) single crystals using Cu -edge resonant soft x-ray scattering (RSXS) and angle resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES). The RSXS result reveals that the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
