Benford's law first significant digit and distribution distances for testing the reliability of financial reports in developing countries
Jing Shi, Marcel Ausloos, Tingting Zhu

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the reliability of financial reports in developing countries using Benford's law and distribution distance tests, identifying anomalies and confirming the law's usefulness in detecting data irregularities.
Contribution
It demonstrates the effectiveness of Benford's law and distribution distance tests in assessing financial data reliability in developing countries over a 14-year period.
Findings
Many anomalous data points were identified and removed.
Distributions aligned better with Benford's law after data cleaning.
Some outliers persisted, indicating potential data issues.
Abstract
We discuss a common suspicion about reported financial data, in 10 industrial sectors of the 6 so called "main developing countries" over the time interval [2000-2014]. These data are examined through Benford's law first significant digit and through distribution distances tests. It is shown that several visually anomalous data have to be a priori removed. Thereafter, the distributions much better follow the first digit significant law, indicating the usefulness of a Benford's law test from the research starting line. The same holds true for distance tests. A few outliers are pointed out.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBenford’s Law and Fraud Detection
