A mildly relativistic wide-angle outflow in the neutron star merger GW170817
K. P. Mooley (1,2,3,19), E. Nakar (4), K. Hotokezaka (5), G. Hallinan, (3), A. Corsi (6), D.A. Frail (2), A. Horesh (7), T. Murphy (8,9), E. Lenc, (8,9), D.L. Kaplan (10), K. De (3), D. Dobie (8,9,11), P. Chandra (12,13), A., Deller (14), O. Gottlieb (4), M.M. Kasliwal (3)

TL;DR
GW170817's radio observations suggest a mildly relativistic wide-angle outflow, likely a cocoon from neutron star merger ejecta, rather than an off-axis ultra-relativistic jet, explaining its electromagnetic signals.
Contribution
This study provides evidence against an off-axis jet in GW170817 and supports a cocoon model as the source of observed emissions, offering new insights into neutron star merger outflows.
Findings
Radio light curve lacks off-axis jet signature
Supports a mildly relativistic wide-angle outflow model
Cocoon scenario explains multi-wavelength emissions
Abstract
GW170817 is the first gravitational wave detection of a binary neutron star merger. It was accompanied by radiation across the electromagnetic spectrum and localized to the galaxy NGC 4993 at a distance of 40 Mpc. It has been proposed that the observed gamma-ray, X-ray and radio emission is due to an ultra-relativistic jet launched during the merger, directed away from our line of sight. The presence of such a jet is predicted from models positing neutron star mergers as the central engines driving short-hard gamma-ray bursts (SGRBs). Here we show that the radio light curve of GW170817 has no direct signature of an off-axis jet afterglow. While we cannot rule out the existence of a jet pointing elsewhere, the observed gamma-rays could not have originated from such a jet. Instead, the radio data requires a mildly relativistic wide-angle outflow moving towards us. This outflow could be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
