Quantum Prisoners' Dilemma under Enhanced Interrogation
George Siopsis, Radhakrishnan Balu, Neal Solmeyer

TL;DR
This paper explores how tripartite entanglement in a quantum prisoners' dilemma can lead to Nash equilibria that align with cooperative Pareto optimality, revealing complex strategic structures.
Contribution
It introduces a third qubit to enlarge the Hilbert space, enabling analysis of tripartite entanglement's impact on game equilibria and cooperation.
Findings
Nash equilibria can match Pareto optimal cooperation with tripartite entanglement.
Game structure varies significantly between W-state and bipartite entanglement.
Tripartite entanglement influences strategic outcomes in quantum games.
Abstract
In the quantum version of prisoners' dilemma, each prisoner is equipped with a single qubit that the interrogator can entangle. We enlarge the available Hilbert space by introducing a third qubit that the interrogator can entangle with the other two. We discuss an enhanced interrogation technique based on tripartite entanglement and analyze Nash equilibria. We show that for tripartite entanglement approaching a W-state, there exist Nash equilibria that coincide with the Pareto optimal choice where both prisoners cooperate. Upon continuous variation between a W-state and a pure bipartite entangled state, the game is shown to have a surprisingly rich structure. The role of bipartite and tripartite entanglement is explored to explain that structure.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
