Time-dependent mass of cosmological perturbations in the hybrid and dressed metric approaches to loop quantum cosmology
Beatriz Elizaga Navascu\'es, Daniel Mart\'in de Blas, Guillermo A., Mena Marug\'an

TL;DR
This paper compares the hybrid and dressed metric approaches in loop quantum cosmology, focusing on their differences in the effective equations for cosmological perturbations, especially regarding the time-dependent mass during the big bounce.
Contribution
It identifies the origin of differences in the effective equations between the hybrid and dressed metric approaches and analyzes the positivity of the perturbation mass at the bounce.
Findings
The discrepancy in the equations arises from distinct quantization procedures.
Tensor perturbation mass is positive in the hybrid approach under certain conditions.
In the dressed metric approach, the tensor and scalar masses are often nonpositive, especially with quadratic potentials.
Abstract
Loop quantum cosmology has recently been applied in order to extend the analysis of primordial perturbations to the Planck era and discuss the possible effects of quantum geometry on the cosmic microwave background. Two approaches to loop quantum cosmology with admissible ultraviolet behavior leading to predictions that are compatible with observations are the so-called hybrid and dressed metric approaches. In spite of their similarities and relations, we show in this work that the effective equations that they provide for the evolution of the tensor and scalar perturbations are somewhat different. When backreaction is neglected, the discrepancy appears only in the time- dependent mass term of the corresponding field equations. We explain the origin of this difference, arising from the distinct quantization procedures. Besides, given the privileged role that the big bounce plays in loop…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
