Width of the charge-transfer peak in the SU(N) impurity Anderson model and its relevance to non-equilibrium transport
J. Fern\'andez, F. Lisandrini, P. Roura-Bas, C. Gazza, and A. A., Aligia

TL;DR
This paper investigates the width of the charge-transfer peak in the SU(N) impurity Anderson model using various computational methods, revealing how it varies with on-site energy and its implications for non-equilibrium transport in quantum dot systems.
Contribution
The study provides a detailed analysis of the charge-transfer peak width in the SU(N) IAM across different regimes, employing DDMRG, NCA, and a variational approach, and discusses experimental relevance.
Findings
For large positive on-site energy, the width equals the resonant level half-width.
For large negative on-site energy, the width scales with N times the half-width.
Variation in the charge-transfer peak affects conductance in quantum dot experiments.
Abstract
We calculate the width and intensity of the charge-transfer peak (the one lying at the on-site energy ) in the impurity spectral density of states as a function of in the SU() impurity Anderson model (IAM). We use the dynamical density-matrix renormalization group (DDMRG) and the noncrossing-approximation (NCA) for =4, and a 1/ variational approximation in the general case. In particular, while for , where is the resonant level half-width, as expected in the noninteracting case, for one has . In the =2 case, some effects of the variation of with were observed in the conductance through a quantum dot connected asymmetrically to conducting leads at finite bias [J. K\"onemann \textit{et al.}, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{73},…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
