Validation and benchmarking of two particle-in-cell codes for a glow discharge
Johan Carlsson, Alexander Khrabrov, Igor Kaganovich, Timothy Sommerer, and David Keating

TL;DR
This study benchmarks and validates two particle-in-cell codes, EDIPIC and LSP, for glow discharge simulations in helium, focusing on collision models and electric field accuracy, with findings showing good agreement after parameter tuning.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison and validation of EDIPIC and LSP for glow discharge modeling, highlighting the impact of collision model differences.
Findings
Electric fields agree within 10% of experimental values after tuning.
Both codes reproduce the non-monotonic cathode fall width variation.
Discrepancies mainly due to differences in collision models.
Abstract
The two particle-in-cell codes EDIPIC and LSP are benchmarked and validated for a parallel-plate glow discharge in helium, in which the axial electric field had been carefully measured, primarily to investigate and improve the fidelity of their collision models. The scattering anisotropy of electron-impact ionization, as well as the value of the secondary-electron emission yield, are not well known in this case. The experimental uncertainty for the emission yield corresponds to a factor of two variation in the cathode current. If the emission yield is tuned to make the cathode current computed by each code match the experiment, the computed electric fields are in excellent agreement with each other, and within about 10\% of the experimental value. The non-monotonic variation of the width of the cathode fall with the applied voltage seen in the experiment is reproduced by both codes. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
