Li-Yorke sensitivity does not imply Li-Yorke chaos
Jana Hant\'akov\'a

TL;DR
The paper constructs a specific example of a dynamical system that is Li-Yorke sensitive but does not exhibit Li-Yorke chaos, disproving a previous conjecture linking the two concepts.
Contribution
It provides a counterexample in an infinite-dimensional setting showing Li-Yorke sensitivity does not necessarily lead to Li-Yorke chaos.
Findings
Constructed an infinite-dimensional compact metric space with a skew-product map.
Demonstrated the system is Li-Yorke sensitive but has at most countable scrambled sets.
Disproved the conjecture that Li-Yorke sensitivity implies Li-Yorke chaos.
Abstract
We construct an infinite-dimensional compact metric space , which is a closed subset of , where is the unit circle and is the Hilbert cube, and a skew-product map acting on such that is Li-Yorke sensitive but possesses at most countable scrambled sets. This disproves the conjecture of Akin and Kolyada that Li-Yorke sensitivity implies Li-Yorke chaos from the article [Akin E., Kolyada S., Li-Yorke sensitivity, Nonlinearity 16, (2003), 1421-1433].
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
