Clustering Constraints on the Relative Sizes of Central and Satellite Galaxies
Andrew Hearin, Peter Behroozi, Andrey Kravtsov, Benjamin Moster

TL;DR
This study uses galaxy clustering data from SDSS to empirically link galaxy size to halo virial radius, revealing that satellite galaxies are smaller than centrals of the same halo mass, with a simple size-virial radius relation.
Contribution
It introduces a straightforward empirical model connecting galaxy size to halo virial radius at maximum mass, explaining size differences between satellite and central galaxies.
Findings
Small galaxies cluster more strongly than large ones at fixed stellar mass.
The size-virial radius relation accurately reproduces clustering patterns.
Satellite galaxies are smaller than centrals of the same halo mass, with size set before infall.
Abstract
We empirically constrain how galaxy size relates to halo virial radius using new measurements of the size- and stellar mass-dependent clustering of galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. We find that small galaxies cluster much more strongly than large galaxies of the same stellar mass. The magnitude of this clustering difference increases on small scales, and decreases with increasing stellar mass. Using Halotools to forward model the observations, we test an empirical model in which present-day galaxy size is proportional to the size of the virial radius at the time the halo reached its maximum mass. This simple model reproduces the observed size-dependence of galaxy clustering in striking detail. The success of this model provides strong support for the conclusion that satellite galaxies have smaller sizes relative to central galaxies of the same halo mass. Our findings indicate…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
