Canonical transformation path to gauge theories of gravity II --- Spacetime coupling of spin-0 and spin-1 particle fields
J. Struckmeier, J. Muench, P. Liebrich, M. Hanauske, J. Kirsch, D., Vasak, L. Satarov, H. Stoecker

TL;DR
This paper explores how different types of spin-0 and spin-1 particles couple to gravity, revealing that massive vector fields generate spacetime torsion while massless ones do not, based on their energy-momentum tensors.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the coupling of gravitational fields with various scalar and vector fields, highlighting differences in their energy-momentum tensors and resulting spacetime properties.
Findings
Massive vector fields use the canonical energy-momentum tensor as source.
Massive vector fields generate spacetime torsion.
Massless charged vector fields are associated with the metric energy-momentum tensor and do not generate torsion.
Abstract
The generic form of spacetime dynamics as a classical gauge field theory has recently been derived, based on only the action principle and on the Principle of General Relativity. It was thus shown that Einstein's General Relativity is the special case where (i) the Hilbert Lagrangian (essentially the Ricci scalar) is supposed to describe the dynamics of the "free" (uncoupled) gravitational field, and (ii) the energy-momentum tensor is that of scalar fields representing real or complex structureless (spin-) particles. It followed that all other source fields---such as vector fields representing massive and non-massive spin- particles---need careful scrutiny of the appropriate source tensor. This is the subject of our actual paper: we discuss in detail the coupling of the gravitational field with (i) a massive complex scalar field, (ii) a massive real vector field, and (iii) a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
