Stability, cohomology vanishing, and non-approximable groups
Marcus De Chiffre, Lev Glebsky, Alex Lubotzky, and Andreas Thom

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates the existence of finitely presented groups that cannot be approximated by finite-dimensional unitary groups under the Frobenius norm, linking cohomology vanishing phenomena to stability and non-approximability.
Contribution
It provides the first example of groups not Frobenius-approximable, connecting cohomology vanishing with stability and approximation properties.
Findings
Existence of non-approximable finitely presented groups.
Cohomology vanishing implies stability of approximate homomorphisms.
Certain non-residually finite central extensions are stable and non-approximable.
Abstract
Several well-known open questions (such as: are all groups sofic/hyperlinear?) have a common form: can all groups be approximated by asymptotic homomorphisms into the symmetric groups (in the sofic case) or the finite dimensional unitary groups (in the hyperlinear case)? In the case of , the question can be asked with respect to different metrics and norms. This paper answers, for the first time, one of these versions, showing that there exist fintely presented groups which are not approximated by with respect to the Frobenius norm . Our strategy is to show that some higher dimensional cohomology vanishing phenomena implies stability, that is, every Frobenius-approximate homomorphism into finite-dimensional unitary groups is close to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
