A two-stage Fisher exact test for multi-arm studies with binary outcome variables
Michael Grayling, Adrian Mander, James Wason

TL;DR
This paper introduces a two-stage Fisher exact test for multi-arm binary outcome studies, offering a less conservative alternative to existing exact methods with controlled error rates and optimized design parameters.
Contribution
It develops a novel two-stage Fisher exact test for multi-arm studies, enabling early stopping and precise error control, improving efficiency over traditional methods.
Findings
Less conservative than existing exact binomial designs
Effective control of familywise error rate
Optimized design parameters for desirable operating characteristics
Abstract
In small sample studies with binary outcome data, use of a normal approximation for hypothesis testing can lead to substantial inflation of the type-I error-rate. Consequently, exact statistical methods are necessitated, and accordingly, much research has been conducted to facilitate this. Recently, this has included methodology for the design of two-stage multi-arm studies utilising exact binomial tests. These designs were demonstrated to carry substantial efficiency advantages over a fixed sample design, but generally suffered from strong conservatism. An alternative classical means of small sample inference with dichotomous data is Fisher's exact test. However, this method is limited to single-stage designs when there are multiple arms. Therefore, here, we propose a two-stage version of Fisher's exact test, with the potential to stop early to accept or reject null hypotheses, which…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Statistical Methods and Inference · Optimal Experimental Design Methods
