AI Safety Gridworlds
Jan Leike, Miljan Martic, Victoria Krakovna, Pedro A. Ortega, Tom, Everitt, Andrew Lefrancq, Laurent Orseau, Shane Legg

TL;DR
The paper introduces a suite of reinforcement learning environments designed to test various AI safety properties, revealing current algorithms' inability to reliably achieve safe behavior across diverse safety challenges.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive set of safety-focused RL environments and benchmarks, highlighting the need for improved safety mechanisms in AI agents.
Findings
Current RL agents struggle with safety tasks
The environments effectively differentiate safety performance
Highlighting gaps in existing reinforcement learning methods
Abstract
We present a suite of reinforcement learning environments illustrating various safety properties of intelligent agents. These problems include safe interruptibility, avoiding side effects, absent supervisor, reward gaming, safe exploration, as well as robustness to self-modification, distributional shift, and adversaries. To measure compliance with the intended safe behavior, we equip each environment with a performance function that is hidden from the agent. This allows us to categorize AI safety problems into robustness and specification problems, depending on whether the performance function corresponds to the observed reward function. We evaluate A2C and Rainbow, two recent deep reinforcement learning agents, on our environments and show that they are not able to solve them satisfactorily.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReinforcement Learning in Robotics · Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
MethodsA2C
