A Pedagogical Intrinsic Approach to Relative Entropies as Potential Functions of Quantum Metrics: the $q$-$z$ Family
Florio M. Ciaglia, Fabio Di Cosmo, Marco Laudato, Giuseppe Marmo,, Fabio M. Mele, Franco Ventriglia, Patrizia Vitale

TL;DR
This paper introduces a geometric framework for quantum relative entropies, specifically the $q$-$z$ family, deriving coordinate-independent metric tensors that unify and generalize well-known quantum metrics.
Contribution
It develops an intrinsic, coordinate-free geometric formalism for quantum metrics derived from the $q$-$z$ relative entropies, extending to arbitrary finite-dimensional quantum systems.
Findings
Explicit coordinate-free expressions for quantum metrics like von Neumann-Umegaki, Bures, and Wigner-Yanase.
Unified geometric approach applicable to all $n$-level quantum systems.
Recovery of known quantum metrics as special cases within the $q$-$z$ family.
Abstract
The so-called -z-\textit{R\'enyi Relative Entropies} provide a huge two-parameter family of relative entropies which includes almost all well-known examples of quantum relative entropies for suitable values of the parameters. In this paper we consider a log-regularized version of this family and use it as a family of potential functions to generate covariant symmetric tensors on the space of invertible quantum states in finite dimensions. The geometric formalism developed here allows us to obtain the explicit expressions of such tensor fields in terms of a basis of globally defined differential forms on a suitable unfolding space without the need to introduce a specific set of coordinates. To make the reader acquainted with the intrinsic formalism introduced, we first perform the computation for the qubit case, and then, we extend the computation of the metric-like tensors to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
