Differences in 1D electron plasma wake field acceleration in MeV versus GeV and linear versus blowout regimes
David Tsiklauri (Queen Mary University of London)

TL;DR
This study uses 1D PIC simulations to compare electron plasma wakefield acceleration in MeV versus GeV energies and linear versus blowout regimes, revealing key differences in wakefield amplitude, stability, and optimal bunch positioning.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the differences between linear and blowout regimes at different energy scales using fully electromagnetic PIC simulations.
Findings
GeV energies produce larger wakefields and longer-lasting bunches.
Fluid simulations may be inaccurate unless the bunch is highly relativistic.
Optimal trailing bunch placement is around 90-100 c/ω_pe in the blowout regime.
Abstract
In some laboratory and most astrophysical situations plasma wake-field acceleration of electrons is one dimensional, i.e. variation transverse to the beam's motion can be ignored. Thus, one dimensional (1D), particle-in-cell (PIC), fully electromagnetic simulations of electron plasma wake field acceleration are conducted in order to study the differences in electron plasma wake field acceleration in MeV versus GeV and linear versus blowout regimes. First, we show that caution needs to be taken when using fluid simulations, as PIC simulations prove that an approximation for an electron bunch not to evolve in time for few hundred plasma periods only applies when it is sufficiently relativistic. This conclusion is true irrespective of the plasma temperature. We find that in the linear regime and GeV energies, the accelerating electric field generated by the plasma wake is similar to the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
