An adaptive multiphysics model coupling vertical equilibrium and full multidimensions for multiphase flow in porous media
Beatrix Becker, Bo Guo, Karl Bandilla, Michael A. Celia, Bernd, Flemisch, Rainer Helmig

TL;DR
This paper introduces an adaptive multiphysics modeling approach that couples vertical equilibrium and full multidimensional models for efficient and accurate simulation of multiphase flow in porous media, optimizing computational resources.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel adaptive coupling method that dynamically applies VE and full models based on a new criterion, enhancing efficiency without sacrificing accuracy.
Findings
Significant reduction in computational cost compared to full multidimensional models.
Maintains high accuracy in simulating gas injection scenarios.
Provides guidelines for optimal threshold parameter selection.
Abstract
Efficient multiphysics models that can adapt to the varying complexity of physical processes in space and time are desirable for modeling fluid migration in the subsurface. Vertical equilibrium (VE) models are simplified mathematical models that are computationally efficient but rely on the assumption of instant gravity segregation of the two phases, which may not be valid at all times or at all locations in the domain. Here, we present a multiphysics model that couples a VE model to a full multidimensional model that has no reduction in dimensionality. We develop a criterion that determines subdomains where the VE assumption is valid during simulation. The VE model is then adaptively applied in those subdomains, reducing the number of computational cells due to the reduction in dimensionality, while the rest of the domain is solved by the full multidimensional model. We analyze how the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
