On choosing meaningful research projects in the natural sciences

TL;DR

This paper discusses how the changing landscape of scientific research, influenced by technology, societal expectations, and teamwork, impacts the selection of meaningful and productive research projects in the natural sciences.

Contribution

It offers guidance for prospective scientists on choosing impactful research projects amidst evolving external influences and societal demands.

Findings

Highlights the influence of computers, societal expectations, and teamwork on research choices.

Provides suggestions to improve public understanding and trust in science.

Emphasizes the importance of meaningful project selection in scientific progress.

Abstract

Over the last few decades, the nature of scientific research has changed in response to external influences. Firstly, powerful networked computers have become a standard tool. Secondly, society presses ever harder for research to deliver something "useful" back to society, both through the kinds of funding opportunities that are made available, and through a critical public eye. Many funding agencies now demand "deliverables" that seem to select research of a particular kind. Lastly, teamwork, often within very large projects, has become commonplace. Here, we step back and ask how prospective research scientists might select productive research projects in this evolving environment. We hope that our suggestions might also help to improve public understanding and thereby restore flagging faith in science.