The Peridynamic Stress Tensors and the Non-local to Local Passage

TL;DR

This paper redefines and compares peridynamic stress tensors, establishing their properties, limits, and relation to classical stress tensors, thereby clarifying the non-local to local transition in elasticity models.

Contribution

It introduces two new peridynamic stress tensors, analyzes their symmetry and divergence, and connects the non-local limit to classical stress tensors, advancing the theoretical understanding of peridynamics.

Findings

The tensor P differs from the earlier tensor ν but has the same divergence.

The tensor P^y is symmetric in bond-based peridynamics.

The limit of P as non-locality vanishes coincides with the collapsed tensor ν_0.

Abstract

We re-examine the notion of stress in peridynamics. Based on the idea of traction we define two new peridynamic stress tensors $\mathbf{P}^{\mathbf{y}}$ and $\mathbf{P}$ which stand, respectively, for analogues of the Cauchy and 1st Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensors from classical elasticity. We show that the tensor $\mathbf{P}$ differs from the earlier defined peridynamic stress tensor $\nu$; though their divergence is equal. We address the question of symmetry of the tensor $\mathbf{P}^{\mathbf{y}}$ which proves to be symmetric in case of bond-based peridynamics; as opposed to the inverse Piola transform of $\nu$ (corresponding to the analogue of Cauchy stress tensor) which fails to be symmetric in general. We also derive a general formula of the force-flux in peridynamics and compute the limit of $\mathbf{P}$ for vanishing non-locality, denoted by $\mathbf{P}_0$. We show that this tensor $\mathbf{P}_0$ surprisingly coincides with the collapsed tensor $\nu_0$, a limit of the original tensor $\nu$. At the end, using this flux-formula, we suggest an explanation why the collapsed tensor $\mathbf{P}_0$ (and hence $\nu_0$) can be indeed identified with the 1st Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensor.