Revisiting the bulge-halo conspiracy II: Towards explaining its puzzling dependence on redshift
Francesco Shankar (1), Alessandro Sonnenfeld (2), Philip Grylls (1),, Lorenzo Zanisi (1), Carlo Nipoti (3), Kyu-Hyun Chae (4), Mariangela Bernardi, (5), Carlo Enrico Petrillo (6), Marc Huertas-Company (7), Gary A. Mamon (8),, Stewart Buchan (1) ((1) University of Southampton

TL;DR
This study investigates how the total mass density profile of massive early-type galaxies evolves with redshift, emphasizing the importance of a redshift-dependent Sersic index to explain observed flattening of the density slope.
Contribution
It demonstrates that allowing the Sersic index to vary with redshift is essential to reproduce the observed evolution of galaxy density profiles, independent of other model assumptions.
Findings
A flatter density slope at higher redshift requires a redshift-dependent Sersic index n(z)~(1+z)^(-1).
Secondary effects like adiabatic contraction and initial mass function variations may influence the evolution.
Strong lensing selection effects do not significantly affect the observed redshift dependence.
Abstract
We carry out a systematic investigation of the total mass density profile of massive (Mstar~3e11 Msun) early-type galaxies and its dependence on redshift, specifically in the range 0<z<1. We start from a large sample of SDSS early-type galaxies with stellar masses and effective radii measured assuming two different profiles, de Vaucouleurs and S\'{e}rsic. We assign dark matter haloes to galaxies via abundance matching relations with standard LCDM profiles and concentrations. We then compute the total, mass-weighted density slope at the effective radius gamma', and study its redshift dependence at fixed stellar mass. We find that a necessary condition to induce an increasingly flatter gamma' at higher redshifts, as suggested by current strong lensing data, is to allow the intrinsic stellar profile of massive galaxies to be S\'{e}rsic and the input S\'{e}rsic index n to vary with redshift…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
