Interstellar communication. IV. Benchmarking information carriers
Michael Hippke

TL;DR
This paper compares various potential information carriers for interstellar communication, finding photons generally superior in speed and efficiency, but exploring conditions where alternative carriers might be advantageous.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive benchmarking of different interstellar communication methods, including non-photon carriers, highlighting their advantages and limitations.
Findings
Photons outperform other carriers in speed and energy efficiency.
Inscribed matter requires less energy but has higher latency.
Current technology is insufficient to determine the best low-data-rate beacons.
Abstract
The search for extraterrestrial communication has mainly focused on microwave photons since the 1950s. We compare other high speed information carriers to photons, such as electrons, protons, and neutrinos, gravitational waves, inscribed matter, and artificial megastructures such as occulters. The performance card includes the speed of exchange, information per energy and machine sizes, lensing performance, cost, and complexity. In fast point-to-point communications, photons are superior to other carriers by orders of magnitude. Sending probes with inscribed matter requires less energy, but has higher latency. For isotropic beacons with low data rates, our current technological level is insufficient to determine the best choice. We discuss cases where our initial assumptions do not apply, and describe the required properties of hypothetical particles to win over photons.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpace Science and Extraterrestrial Life · Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena · Neutrino Physics Research
