What makes magnetic skyrmions different from magnetic bubbles ?
Andrei B. Bogatyr\"ev, Konstantin L. Metlov

TL;DR
This paper develops a theoretical framework to distinguish magnetic skyrmions from magnetic bubbles, revealing differences rooted in the in-plane phase of magnetization textures and the influence of magnetic anisotropy.
Contribution
The paper introduces a complex calculus-based theory to differentiate magnetic skyrmions from bubbles, emphasizing the role of in-plane phase and anisotropy in their properties.
Findings
Magnetic skyrmions and bubbles can have the same topological charge but differ in in-plane phase.
Magnetic anisotropy influences whether textures exhibit classical-like or quantum-like features.
Theoretical distinctions are established using complex calculus to analyze magnetization textures.
Abstract
A large enough piece of ferromagnet is usually not magnetized uniformly, but develops a magnetization texture. In thin films these textures can be doubly-periodic. Such are the well known magnetic bubble domains and the recently observed "skyrmion" magnetization textures in MnSi. In this paper we develop a theory of periodic magnetization textures, based on complex calculus to answer the question -- is there a difference between those two textures even if they seem to carry the same topological winding number (or topological charge) ? We find that such difference exists, facilitated by a different role played by the magnetization vector's in-plane phase. We separate classical-like and quantum-like features of magnetization textures and highlight the role of magnetic anisotropy in favouring either of these cases.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
