Models of gravitational lens candidates from Space Warps CFHTLS
Rafael K\"ung (1), Prasenjit Saha (1), Ignacio Ferreras (2), Elisabeth, Baeten (3), Jonathan Coles (4), Claude Cornen (3), Christine Macmillan (3),, Phil Marshall (5), Anupreeta More (6), Lucy Oswald (7), Aprajita Verma (8),

TL;DR
This paper reports follow-up modeling of gravitational lens candidates from the Space Warps project, categorizing models based on morphology, plausibility, and mass comparisons, revealing insights into lens mass ranges and stellar-to-total mass fractions.
Contribution
It introduces a systematic categorization of lens models and discusses software improvements and strategies for future large-scale surveys.
Findings
Lensing masses range from ~10^11 to >10^13 Msun.
Stellar mass shows a smaller spread, indicating a decline in stellar-to-total mass fraction with increasing lens mass.
Two low-mass outliers suggest interesting low star-formation efficiency regimes.
Abstract
We report modelling follow-up of recently-discovered gravitational-lens candidates in the Canada France Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey. Lens modelling was done by a small group of specially-interested volunteers from the SpaceWarps citizen-science community who originally found the candidate lenses. Models are categorised according to seven diagnostics indicating (a) the image morphology and how clear or indistinct it is, (b) whether the mass map and synthetic lensed image appear to be plausible, and (c) how the lens-model mass compares with the stellar mass and the abundance-matched halo mass. The lensing masses range from ~10^11 Msun to >10^13 Msun. Preliminary estimates of the stellar masses show a smaller spread in stellar mass (except for two lenses): a factor of a few below or above ~10^11 Msun. Therefore, we expect the stellar-to-total mass fraction to decline sharply as lensing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
