Cosmological constant constraints from observation-derived energy condition bounds and their application to bimetric massive gravity
M.E.S. Alves, F.C. Carvalho, J.C.N. de Araujo, M. Penna-Lima, S.D.P., Vitenti

TL;DR
This paper uses observational data and energy condition bounds to constrain the effective cosmological constant and applies these constraints to specific bimetric massive gravity theories, testing their viability for explaining cosmic acceleration.
Contribution
It introduces a model-independent method to constrain the cosmological constant using energy conditions and observational data, and applies these constraints to bimetric massive gravity models.
Findings
Bounds on the effective cosmological constant: 0.59-0.91 (1σ), 0.40-0.93 (3σ)
Approximately 30% of posterior distribution incompatible with a cosmological constant
Constraints on parameter spaces of bimetric gravity theories based on observational bounds
Abstract
Among the various possibilities to probe the theory behind the recent accelerated expansion of the universe, the energy conditions (ECs) are of particular interest, since it is possible to confront and constrain the many models, including different theories of gravity, with observational data. In this context, we use the ECs to probe any alternative theory whose extra term acts as a cosmological constant. For this purpose, we apply a model-independent approach to reconstruct the recent expansion of the universe. Using Type Ia supernova, baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmic-chronometer data, we perform a Markov Chain Monte Carlo analysis to put constraints on the effective cosmological constant . By imposing that the cosmological constant is the only component that possibly violates the ECs, we derive lower and upper bounds for its value. For instance, we obtain…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
