Putting atomic diffusion theory of magnetic ApBp stars to the test: evaluation of the predictions of time-dependent diffusion models
O. Kochukhov, T.A. Ryabchikova

TL;DR
This study critically tests advanced atomic diffusion models for magnetic ApBp stars by comparing their predictions with observations, revealing significant discrepancies in element abundances and questioning the models' accuracy in explaining surface chemical distributions.
Contribution
It provides the first direct comparison between sophisticated time-dependent diffusion models and empirical surface maps, highlighting their limitations in matching observed element distributions.
Findings
Mean Fe and Cr abundances are grossly underestimated by models.
Doppler imaging can accurately reconstruct horizontal abundance maps.
Current diffusion models poorly predict observed chemical spot patterns.
Abstract
A series of recent theoretical atomic diffusion studies has address the challenging problem of predicting inhomogeneous vertical and horizontal chemical element distributions in the atmospheres of magnetic ApBp stars. Here we critically assess the most sophisticated of such diffusion models - based on a time-dependent treatment of the atomic diffusion in a magnetised stellar atmosphere - by direct comparison with observations as well by testing the widely used surface mapping tools with the spectral line profiles predicted by this theory. We show that the mean abundances of Fe and Cr are grossly underestimated by the time-dependent theoretical diffusion model, with discrepancies reaching a factor of 1000 for Cr. We also demonstrate that Doppler imaging inversion codes, based either on modelling of individual metal lines or line-averaged profiles simulated according to theoretical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
