One Hundred Years of the Cosmological Constant: from 'Superfluous Stunt' to Dark Energy
Cormac O'Raifeartaigh, Michael O'Keeffe, Werner Nahm, Simon Mitton

TL;DR
This paper reviews the history of the cosmological constant over a century, highlighting its fluctuating role in cosmology and its resurgence driven by empirical evidence and modern observations.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive historical and philosophical analysis of the cosmological constant's evolving role and its re-emergence in contemporary cosmology through empirical advances.
Findings
The cosmological constant was never truly abandoned but sidelined for convenience.
Its modern resurgence was driven by empirical measurements like supernovae and CMB.
The paper discusses current interpretations and the cosmological constant problem.
Abstract
We present a centennial review of the history of the term known as the cosmological constant. First introduced to the general theory of relativity by Einstein in 1917 in order to describe a universe that was assumed to be static, the term fell from favour in the wake of the discovery of the expanding universe, only to make a dramatic return in recent times. We consider historical and philosophical aspects of the cosmological constant over four main epochs: (i) the use of the term in static cosmologies (both Newtonian and relativistic); (ii) the marginalization of the term following the discovery of cosmic expansion; (iii) the use of the term to address specific cosmic puzzles such as the timespan of expansion, the formation of galaxies and the redshifts of the quasars; (iv) the re-emergence of the term in today's Lamda-CDM cosmology. We find that the cosmological constant was never…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
