Identifying the progenitors of present-day early-type galaxies in observational surveys: correcting `progenitor bias' using the Horizon-AGN simulation
G. Martin (1), S. Kaviraj (1), J. E. G. Devriendt (2), Y. Dubois (3),, C. Pichon (3, 4), C. Laigle (2) ((1) University of Hertfordshire, (2), University of Oxford, (3) Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, (4) Korea, Institute of Advanced Studies)

TL;DR
This study uses the Horizon-AGN simulation to analyze the merger histories of local early-type galaxies, addressing progenitor bias by providing a framework to better understand their assembly over cosmic time.
Contribution
It introduces a method to correct progenitor bias in observational studies of early-type galaxy evolution using simulation data.
Findings
Most early-types acquire their morphology by z~1.
Majority of mergers involve late-type progenitors, especially at high redshift.
Progenitor bias significantly affects the interpretation of galaxy evolution at higher redshifts.
Abstract
As endpoints of the hierarchical mass-assembly process, the stellar populations of local early-type galaxies encode the assembly history of galaxies over cosmic time. We use Horizon-AGN, a cosmological hydrodynamical simulation, to study the merger histories of local early-type galaxies and track how the morphological mix of their progenitors evolves over time. We provide a framework for alleviating `progenitor bias' -- the bias that occurs if one uses only early-type galaxies to study the progenitor population. Early-types attain their final morphology at relatively early epochs -- by , around 60 per cent of today's early-types have had their last significant merger. At all redshifts, the majority of mergers have one late-type progenitor, with late-late mergers dominating at and early-early mergers becoming significant only at . Progenitor bias is severe at all…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
