Participation and Performance on Paper- and Computer-Based Low-Stakes Assessments
Jayson M. Nissen, Manher Jariwala, Eleanor W. Close, and Ben Van Dusen

TL;DR
This study shows that online out-of-class low-stakes assessments yield comparable student performance data to traditional in-class paper tests, while also offering logistical advantages for instructors.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence that online low-stakes RBAs can replace in-class paper assessments without sacrificing data quality, with strategies to improve participation.
Findings
Performance on online and paper RBAs is equivalent.
Participation rates can be improved with incentives and reminders.
Online assessments save time and resources.
Abstract
High-stakes assessments, such the Graduate Records Examination, have transitioned from paper to computer administration. Low-stakes Research-Based Assessments (RBAs), such as the Force Concept Inventory, have only recently begun this transition to computer administration with online services. These online services can simplify administering, scoring, and interpreting assessments, thereby reducing barriers to instructors' use of RBAs. By supporting instructors' objective assessment of the efficacy of their courses, these services can stimulate instructors to transform their courses to improve student outcomes. We investigate the extent to which RBAs administered outside of class with the online Learning About STEM Student Outcomes (LASSO) platform provide equivalent data to tests administered on paper in class, in terms of both student participation and performance. We use an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
