Enabling Reasoning with LegalRuleML
Ho-Pun Lam, Mustafa Hashmi

TL;DR
This paper introduces a method to translate legal norms from LegalRuleML into a modal defeasible logic framework, enabling automated reasoning and compliance checking with legal rules.
Contribution
It presents a novel approach for converting LegalRuleML to a logic formalism that captures deontic effects for better automated legal reasoning.
Findings
Successful transformation between LegalRuleML and Modal Defeasible Logic
Enhanced reasoning capabilities for legal norms
Supports automated compliance verification
Abstract
In order to automate verification process, regulatory rules written in natural language need to be translated into a format that machines can understand. However, none of the existing formalisms can fully represent the elements that appear in legal norms. For instance, most of these formalisms do not provide features to capture the behavior of deontic effects, which is an important aspect in automated compliance checking. This paper presents an approach for transforming legal norms represented using LegalRuleML to a variant of Modal Defeasible Logic (and vice versa) such that a legal statement represented using LegalRuleML can be transformed into a machine-readable format that can be understood and reasoned about depending upon the client's preferences.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBusiness Process Modeling and Analysis · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
