The signature of robot action success in EEG signals of a human observer: Decoding and visualization using deep convolutional neural networks

TL;DR

This study demonstrates that deep convolutional neural networks significantly improve the accuracy of decoding robot errors from EEG signals of human observers during interaction tasks, surpassing traditional methods.

Contribution

The paper introduces a novel deep ConvNet framework that enhances EEG-based decoding of robot errors, providing better accuracy and interpretability compared to existing classifiers.

Findings

Deep ConvNets achieved 75% accuracy in error detection.

ConvNets outperformed rLDA and FB-CSP + rLDA classifiers.

Visualization revealed meaningful spatiotemporal EEG patterns.

Abstract

The importance of robotic assistive devices grows in our work and everyday life. Cooperative scenarios involving both robots and humans require safe human-robot interaction. One important aspect here is the management of robot errors, including fast and accurate online robot-error detection and correction. Analysis of brain signals from a human interacting with a robot may help identifying robot errors, but accuracies of such analyses have still substantial space for improvement. In this paper we evaluate whether a novel framework based on deep convolutional neural networks (deep ConvNets) could improve the accuracy of decoding robot errors from the EEG of a human observer, both during an object grasping and a pouring task. We show that deep ConvNets reached significantly higher accuracies than both regularized Linear Discriminant Analysis (rLDA) and filter bank common spatial patterns (FB-CSP) combined with rLDA, both widely used EEG classifiers. Deep ConvNets reached mean accuracies of 75% +/- 9 %, rLDA 65% +/- 10% and FB-CSP + rLDA 63% +/- 6% for decoding of erroneous vs. correct trials. Visualization of the time-domain EEG features learned by the ConvNets to decode errors revealed spatiotemporal patterns that reflected differences between the two experimental paradigms. Across subjects, ConvNet decoding accuracies were significantly correlated with those obtained with rLDA, but not CSP, indicating that in the present context ConvNets behaved more 'rLDA-like' (but consistently better), while in a previous decoding study with another task but the same ConvNet architecture, it was found to behave more 'CSP-like'. Our findings thus provide further support for the assumption that deep ConvNets are a versatile addition to the existing toolbox of EEG decoding techniques, and we discuss steps how ConvNet EEG decoding performance could be further optimized.