Bayesian uncertainty quantification in linear models for diffusion MRI
Jens Sj\"olund, Anders Eklund, Evren \"Ozarslan, Magnus Herberthson,, Maria B{\aa}nkestad, Hans Knutsson

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Bayesian framework for linear diffusion MRI models, enabling accurate uncertainty quantification of derived features, validated through simulations and in vivo data, enhancing group analysis reliability.
Contribution
It recasts popular dMRI models as Bayesian models, providing closed-form posterior distributions for affine functions of coefficients, and validates uncertainty estimates with simulations and real data.
Findings
Bayesian interpretation allows uncertainty quantification in dMRI models.
Theoretical quantiles match empirical results, validating the approach.
Uncertainty maps improve group analysis by downweighting uncertain subjects.
Abstract
Diffusion MRI (dMRI) is a valuable tool in the assessment of tissue microstructure. By fitting a model to the dMRI signal it is possible to derive various quantitative features. Several of the most popular dMRI signal models are expansions in an appropriately chosen basis, where the coefficients are determined using some variation of least-squares. However, such approaches lack any notion of uncertainty, which could be valuable in e.g. group analyses. In this work, we use a probabilistic interpretation of linear least-squares methods to recast popular dMRI models as Bayesian ones. This makes it possible to quantify the uncertainty of any derived quantity. In particular, for quantities that are affine functions of the coefficients, the posterior distribution can be expressed in closed-form. We simulated measurements from single- and double-tensor models where the correct values of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
