Comparison of heavy-ion transport simulations: Collision integral in a box
Ying-Xun Zhang, Yong-Jia Wang, Maria Colonna, Pawel Danielewicz, Akira, Ono, Betty Tsang, Hermann Wolter, Jun Xu, Lie-Wen Chen, Dan Cozma, Zhao-Qing, Feng, Subal Das Gupta, Natsumi Ikeno, Che-Ming Ko, Bao-An Li, Qing-Feng Li,, Zhu-Xia Li, Swagata Mallik, Yasushi Nara

TL;DR
This study compares 15 heavy-ion transport codes in a controlled box setup to evaluate their collision integral implementations, revealing phase-space fluctuation issues affecting Pauli blocking accuracy and guiding improvements in simulation strategies.
Contribution
First comprehensive comparison of collision integral handling in multiple transport codes using a controlled box setup, highlighting phase-space fluctuation impacts on Pauli blocking accuracy.
Findings
Collision rates match analytical results when Pauli blocking is suppressed.
Pauli blocking probabilities deviate due to phase-space fluctuations.
Most codes show a reduction in blocking probability, affecting system evolution.
Abstract
Simulations by transport codes are indispensable to extract valuable physics information from heavy ion collisions. In order to understand the origins of discrepancies between different widely used transport codes, we compare 15 such codes under controlled conditions of a system confined to a box with periodic boundary, initialized with Fermi-Dirac distributions at saturation density and temperatures of either 0 or 5 MeV. In such calculations, one is able to check separately the different ingredients of a transport code. In this second publication of the code evaluation project, we only consider the two-body collision term, i.e. we perform cascade calculations. When the Pauli blocking is artificially suppressed, the collision rates are found to be consistent for most codes (to within or better) with analytical results, or completely controlled results of a basic cascade code after…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
