Detecting Egregious Conversations between Customers and Virtual Agents
Tommy Sandbank, Michal Shmueli-Scheuer, Jonathan Herzig, David, Konopnicki, John Richards, David Piorkowski

TL;DR
This paper presents a method for detecting egregious customer-agent conversations in virtual customer service systems by analyzing behavioral cues and interaction patterns, significantly improving detection accuracy over text-based methods.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach combining behavioral and interaction features for egregious conversation detection, demonstrating its effectiveness across different domains.
Findings
20% improvement in F1-score over textual features
Features are effective across diverse domains
Behavioral cues are key indicators of egregious conversations
Abstract
Virtual agents are becoming a prominent channel of interaction in customer service. Not all customer interactions are smooth, however, and some can become almost comically bad. In such instances, a human agent might need to step in and salvage the conversation. Detecting bad conversations is important since disappointing customer service may threaten customer loyalty and impact revenue. In this paper, we outline an approach to detecting such egregious conversations, using behavioral cues from the user, patterns in agent responses, and user-agent interaction. Using logs of two commercial systems, we show that using these features improves the detection F1-score by around 20% over using textual features alone. In addition, we show that those features are common across two quite different domains and, arguably, universal.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
