TL;DR
This paper reviews the relationship between geometric numerical integrators and the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo method, emphasizing the importance of efficient, volume-preserving, and reversible integrators for high-dimensional sampling.
Contribution
It analyzes how geometric properties of integrators affect HMC efficiency and proposes potential improvements beyond the commonly used velocity Verlet method.
Findings
Velocity Verlet is effective but can be improved.
Geometric properties influence integration error and acceptance rate.
High-dimensional behavior of HMC is discussed.
Abstract
This paper surveys in detail the relations between numerical integration and the Hamiltonian (or hybrid) Monte Carlo method (HMC). Since the computational cost of HMC mainly lies in the numerical integrations, these should be performed as efficiently as possible. However, HMC requires methods that have the geometric properties of being volume-preserving and reversible, and this limits the number of integrators that may be used. On the other hand, these geometric properties have important quantitative implications on the integration error, which in turn have an impact on the acceptance rate of the proposal. While at present the velocity Verlet algorithm is the method of choice for good reasons, we argue that Verlet can be improved upon. We also discuss in detail the behavior of HMC as the dimensionality of the target distribution increases.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
