The Stellar Populations of Two Ultra-Diffuse Galaxies from Optical and Near-infrared Photometry
Viraj Pandya (UCSC), Aaron J. Romanowsky (SJSU, UCO), Seppo Laine, (Caltech-IPAC), Jean P. Brodie (UCSC, UCO), Benjamin D. Johnson (Harvard),, William Glaccum (Caltech-IPAC), Alexa Villaume (UCSC), Jean-Charles, Cuillandre (CEA/IRFU/SAp), Stephen Gwyn (Herzberg), Jessica Krick

TL;DR
This study uses optical and near-infrared photometry to analyze the stellar populations of two ultra-diffuse galaxies, revealing differences in age and metallicity that suggest varied formation histories.
Contribution
It introduces a Bayesian SED fitting approach with new Spitzer-IRAC data to characterize UDG stellar populations across different environments.
Findings
VCC 1287 is old and metal-poor.
DGSAT I is younger with higher metallicity.
Cluster UDGs may be 'failed' galaxies, while field UDGs show signs of feedback-driven expansion.
Abstract
We present observational constraints on the stellar populations of two ultra-diffuse galaxies (UDGs) using optical through near-infrared (NIR) spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting. Our analysis is enabled by new -IRAC 3.6 m and 4.5 m imaging, archival optical imaging, and the prospector fully Bayesian SED fitting framework. Our sample contains one field UDG (DGSAT I), one Virgo cluster UDG (VCC 1287), and one Virgo cluster dwarf elliptical for comparison (VCC 1122). We find that the optical--NIR colors of the three galaxies are significantly different from each other. We infer that VCC 1287 has an old ( Gyr) and surprisingly metal-poor () stellar population, even after marginalizing over uncertainties on diffuse interstellar dust. In contrast, the field UDG DGSAT I shows evidence of being younger than the Virgo UDG, with an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
