The evolution of the mass-metallicity relation in IllustrisTNG
Paul Torrey (1), Mark Vogelsberger (1), Federico Marinacci (1),, R\"udgier Pakmor (2), Volker Springel (2,3,4), Dylan Nelson (4), Jill Naiman, (5), Annalisa Pillepich (6), Shy Genel (7,8), Rainer Weinberger (2), Lars, Hernquist (5) ((1) MIT, (2) HITS, (3) Heidelberg University

TL;DR
This study uses the IllustrisTNG simulation to analyze the evolution of the gas-phase mass-metallicity relation in galaxies from redshift 0 to 10, revealing insights into metal retention, galaxy gas fractions, and the relation's scatter.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the IllustrisTNG model accurately reproduces the MZR evolution and provides new predictions for high-redshift galaxy metallicities and their dependence on gas fractions.
Findings
The MZR slope and normalization evolve consistently with observations from z=0 to 2.
Most gas-phase metals are outside the ISM, in the circumgalactic medium or beyond.
The MZR normalization decline is driven by higher gas fractions at high redshift.
Abstract
The coevolution of galaxies and their metal content serves as an important test for galaxy feedback models. We analyze the distribution and evolution of metals within the IllustrisTNG simulation suite with a focus on the gas-phase mass-metallicity relation (MZR). We find that the IllustrisTNG model broadly reproduces the slope and normalization evolution of the MZR across the redshift range and mass range . We make predictions for the high redshift () metal content of galaxies which is described by a gradual decline in the normalization of the metallicity with an average high redshift () evolution fit by . Our simulations indicate that the metal retention efficiency of the interstellar medium (ISM) is low: a majority of gas-phase metals ( 85 per cent at ) live outside…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
