TL;DR
This paper develops new causal inference methods for observational studies with clustered interference, accounting for within-cluster treatment dependence, and demonstrates their application to cholera vaccination data.
Contribution
It introduces novel causal estimands that incorporate within-cluster treatment dependence and proposes inverse probability-weighted estimators for observational clustered interference studies.
Findings
Estimators have desirable large-sample properties.
Simulation shows good finite-sample performance.
Application to cholera data illustrates practical utility.
Abstract
Inferring causal effects from an observational study is challenging because participants are not randomized to treatment. Observational studies in infectious disease research present the additional challenge that one participant's treatment may affect another participant's outcome, i.e., there may be interference. In this paper recent approaches to defining causal effects in the presence of interference are considered, and new causal estimands designed specifically for use with observational studies are proposed. Previously defined estimands target counterfactual scenarios in which individuals independently select treatment with equal probability. However, in settings where there is interference between individuals within clusters, it may be unlikely that treatment selection is independent between individuals in the same cluster. The proposed causal estimands instead describe…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
