Enhanced mixing in giant impact simulations with a new Lagrangian method
Hongping Deng, Christian Reinhardt, Federico Benitez, Lucio Mayer, and, Joachim Stadel

TL;DR
This paper compares standard SPH and a new Lagrangian MFM method in giant impact simulations, demonstrating MFM's superior mixing, turbulence, and physical accuracy, which are crucial for understanding planetary formation.
Contribution
The study introduces and validates the Lagrangian Meshless Finite Mass (MFM) method as an improved alternative to SPH for giant impact simulations, addressing key limitations of SPH.
Findings
MFM drives vigorous turbulence and mixing in impact simulations.
SPH shows limited mixing and unphysical density discontinuities.
MFM conserves angular momentum better and avoids artificial viscosity issues.
Abstract
Giant impacts (GIs) are common in the late stage of planet formation. The Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) method is widely used for simulating the outcome of such violent collisions, one prominent example being the formation of the Moon. However, a decade of numerical studies in various areas of computational astrophysics has shown that the standard formulation of SPH suffers from several shortcomings such as artificial surface tension and its tendency to promptly damp turbulent motions on scales much larger than the physical dissipation scale, both resulting in the suppression of mixing. In order to quantify how severe these limitations are when modeling GIs we carried out a comparison of simulations with identical initial conditions performed with the standard SPH as well as with the novel Lagrangian Meshless Finite Mass (MFM) method in the GIZMO code. We confirm the lack of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
