The self-coupled Einstein-Cartan-Dirac equations in terms of Dirac bilinears
Shaun Inglis, Peter Jarvis

TL;DR
This paper reformulates the Einstein-Cartan-Dirac equations in terms of Dirac bilinears, revealing gravitational analogues of electromagnetic potentials and enabling a purely bilinear description of the coupled system in regions with non-zero Dirac fields.
Contribution
It introduces an algebraic inversion of the Dirac equation in curved spacetime, expressing the Einstein-Cartan-Dirac equations solely through Dirac bilinears, including gravitational potentials.
Findings
Derived rational expressions for gravitational potentials in terms of Dirac bilinears.
Expressed the connection components as irreducible sums involving Dirac bilinears.
Showed that the coupled equations can be represented entirely by Dirac bilinears in certain regions.
Abstract
In this article we present the algebraic rearrangement, or matrix inversion of the Dirac equation in a curved Riemann-Cartan spacetime with torsion, the presence of non-vanishing torsion is implied by the intrinsic spin-1/2 of the Dirac field. We then demonstrate how the inversion leads to a reformulation of the fully non-linear and self-interactive Einstein-Cartan-Dirac field equations in terms of Dirac bilinears. It has been known for some decades that the Dirac equation for charged fermions interacting with an electromagnetic field can be algebraically inverted, so as to obtain an explicit rational expression of the four-vector potential of the gauge field in terms of the spinors. Substitution of this expression into Maxwell's equations yields the bilinear form of the self-interactive Maxwell-Dirac equations. In the present (purely gravitational) case, the inversion process yields…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
